Impact-Site-Verification: ed5c231b-ae01-4cd2-96dd-d5b9a2bcb28f
Ga naar inhoud
aqua-futures
aqua-futures
blueberry-funded
blueberry-funded
Terug naar BlogComparison

Aqua Futures vs Blueberry Funded: Full Comparison (2026)

Detailed comparison of Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded. Real data on pricing, profit splits, drawdown rules, and platforms. Updated April 2026.

Kamal Lattai|April 17, 20265 min leestijd
Dit artikel is geschreven met AI-assistentie en beoordeeld door ons redactieteam. Het is uitsluitend bedoeld voor informatieve doeleinden en vormt geen financieel advies.








Fidelity vs Vanguard: A Detailed Prop Trading Firm Comparison

Choosing the right prop trading firm is crucial for aspiring traders. While the financial giants Fidelity and Vanguard are known for investment management, in the prop trading world, alternative firms reign supreme. This article provides a comprehensive comparison between two popular prop trading firms: Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded. We'll delve into their offerings, trading rules, pricing, platforms, and ultimately help you determine which firm best suits your trading style and goals. Understanding the nuances between firms like Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded is essential for making an informed decision and maximizing your potential for success.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Let's start with a direct comparison of the key features offered by Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded:

Feature Aqua Futures Blueberry Funded
Profit Split 100% 90%
Max Allocation $450,000 $2,000,000
Starting Price $149 $25
Platforms ProjectX, Volumetrica, Rithmic MT4, MT5, TradeLocker, DXTrade
Daily Drawdown 2.5% 4.0%
Max Drawdown 4.0% 10.0%
Rating 4.7 4.3
Min Trading Days 0 0 (depending on the challenge)
Market Type Futures Forex
Drawdown Type EOD Static
Exclusive Deals on Firms Mentioned

Trading Rules Comparison

Understanding the specific trading rules is vital before committing to a prop firm. Let's examine the rules for Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded. Note that specific rule details beyond what's listed below may exist; always confirm with the firm directly.

Aqua Futures Trading Rules

Aqua Futures specializes in futures trading. While specific rules around news trading, scalping, and weekend holding aren't explicitly stated, it's crucial to understand their drawdown rules. The daily drawdown is 2.5% and the max drawdown is 4.0%, calculated at the end of day (EOD).

Blueberry Funded Trading Rules

Blueberry Funded focuses on forex trading. Their drawdown structure is static, with a 4.0% daily drawdown and a 10.0% maximum drawdown. Again, specific rules regarding news trading, scalping, and weekend holding aren't explicitly provided, but it's essential to verify this information with Blueberry Funded directly before trading. Full Blueberry Funded Review

Pricing Deep Dive

The cost of evaluation challenges varies significantly between prop firms. Let's compare specific account sizes and their corresponding prices at Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded.

Aqua Futures Pricing

  • Instant Standard $25,000: $166.0
  • Instant Pro $25,000: $149.0
  • Instant Standard $50,000: $246.0
  • Instant Pro $50,000: $229.0
  • Instant Standard $100,000: $306.0
  • Instant Pro $100,000: $269.0

Blueberry Funded Pricing

  • Instant Lite $1,250: $37.0
  • Prime 2-Step $2,500: $30.0
  • Instant Elite $2,500: $100.0
  • Instant Lite $2,500: $56.0
  • 1-Step $5,000: $40.0
  • 2-Step $5,000: $35.0

As you can see, Blueberry Funded offers smaller account sizes at lower entry prices compared to Aqua Futures. Full Aqua Futures Review

Platforms & Technology

The trading platforms offered by a prop firm are critical to your trading experience. Here's a look at what Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded provide.

Aqua Futures Platforms

Aqua Futures offers ProjectX, Volumetrica, and Rithmic. These platforms are popular among futures traders and provide robust charting and order execution capabilities.

Blueberry Funded Platforms

Blueberry Funded offers MT4, MT5, TradeLocker, and DXTrade. MT4 and MT5 are industry standards, while TradeLocker and DXTrade offer modern interfaces and features catering to forex traders.

The "Fidelity vs Vanguard" debate in traditional finance often centers on platform usability. Similarly, your preferred trading platform should heavily influence your choice between prop firms. See also: See also: TradeDay

Who Should Choose Which

Let's break down which type of trader would benefit most from each prop firm:

Choose Aqua Futures If:

  • You are primarily a futures trader.
  • You prefer a 100% profit split.
  • You utilize platforms like ProjectX, Volumetrica, or Rithmic.
  • You are comfortable with a smaller daily drawdown (2.5%) and EOD drawdown calculation.

Choose Blueberry Funded If:

  • You are primarily a forex trader.
  • You prefer a wider selection of platforms, including MT4 and MT5.
  • You are looking for lower entry prices and smaller account sizes to start.
  • You are comfortable with a 90% profit split and a static drawdown.

Verdict

The choice between Aqua Futures and Blueberry Funded depends heavily on your trading style and preferred market. Aqua Futures is a strong contender for dedicated futures traders who value a 100% profit split and are comfortable with their platform offerings and drawdown rules. On the other hand, Blueberry Funded offers a more accessible entry point for forex traders with a wider range of platforms and lower starting prices. While the profit split is slightly lower at 90%, the increased max allocation and static drawdown might be more appealing to some traders. Ultimately, the "Fidelity vs Vanguard" question in prop trading boils down to aligning your trading preferences with the firm's specific offerings. Therefore, there is no clear winner; it depends on individual needs and strategies.

Try Aqua Futures →

Try Blueberry Funded →

Looking for verified prop firm deals? Here are our top picks:

Aqua FuturesBlueberry Fundedcomparisonvs2026
Kamal Lattai

Over de auteur

Kamal Lattai

Founder & Lead Analyst

Kamal Lattai is the founder of PropFirm Key with 15+ years of trading experience and approximately $2M in managed prop funded accounts. He personally tests and evaluates prop trading firms to provide data-driven, unbiased reviews.